Skip to content Skip to footer
X blocks links to Signal by confusing3478

X blocks links to Signal by confusing3478

31 Comments

  • Post Author
    type_Ben_struct
    Posted February 17, 2025 at 9:20 am

    In my opinion, Elon Musk is the most dangerous man in the world sticky now.

  • Post Author
    xyzal
    Posted February 17, 2025 at 9:23 am

    Tags like #coup, #protest and so on will be next.

  • Post Author
    decimalenough
    Posted February 17, 2025 at 9:23 am

    Remember the Arab Spring and how Twitter was hailed as a tool for the masses to fight against their oppressors? And remember how Elon bought Twitter, loudly proclaiming he was doing so to defend free speech?

    I'm mildly curious to see how X tries to justify this, but I suspect they've reached the stage where they don't even need to pretend to pay lip service to their notional values.

  • Post Author
    nubinetwork
    Posted February 17, 2025 at 9:23 am

    It would really cut down on spam/scams if they also blocked links to Instagram, telegram, and the onlyfans redirect sites…

  • Post Author
    muddi900
    Posted February 17, 2025 at 9:23 am

    I think the only smaet business move for twitter right now is to ban all external links in posts, like Instagram and TikTok.

    It was never much of a driver of traffic outside news and most news consumers that click have already left. And most news sources you'd want to click are behind paywalls The users that remain are more likely to watch Twitter videos and read those long-ass tweets, out of loyalty to Papa Elon.

  • Post Author
    jgaa
    Posted February 17, 2025 at 9:25 am

    So much for Elons "Free Speech"!

    This may come as a shock to him: Free Speech means to allow people to say something that he disagree with. Something that may hurt his interests or even his ego. Free speech is not to allow people to say things he agree with or don't care about.

  • Post Author
    emsign
    Posted February 17, 2025 at 9:25 am

    Ditch Twitter for better alternatives already, it's owned by a man baby that should have never gotten any money from daddy.

  • Post Author
    benguild
    Posted February 17, 2025 at 9:33 am

    This is incredibly stupid if true

  • Post Author
    casenmgreen
    Posted February 17, 2025 at 9:34 am

    I came to the view the Twitter purchase was a deliberate move as part of the lead up to Elon being right-hand-man for Donald. It was about buying influence. The cost of the purchase is nothing compared to the power which has been obtained.

    I note also I tried to make a Twitter account, to post support to Sassoon, and making an account was being profoundly discouraged – I tried twice, both times was asked to complete ten captchas, about five minutes of pure captcha work.

    I suspect this is to block outraged people making new accounts.

  • Post Author
    maxehmookau
    Posted February 17, 2025 at 9:35 am

    All that free speech is a bit too much for dear Elon apparently.

  • Post Author
    aeurielesn
    Posted February 17, 2025 at 9:36 am

    Free speech for thee but not for me.

  • Post Author
    lawgimenez
    Posted February 17, 2025 at 9:49 am

    Deleting my 15 year old Twitter account was one of the best decisions in my life.

  • Post Author
    neumann
    Posted February 17, 2025 at 9:53 am

    Why is anyone on twitter at this point? If you are still there you are part of the problem.

  • Post Author
    teekert
    Posted February 17, 2025 at 9:54 am

    [flagged]

  • Post Author
    kome
    Posted February 17, 2025 at 10:01 am

    Instagram blocked telegram 8 years ago and nobody complained, the ban in still in place as far i know; trying to block the competition is fairly common, unfortunately

  • Post Author
    berkes
    Posted February 17, 2025 at 10:02 am

    I'm not defending Twitter or their policy in any way (disclaimer: I left Twitter the moment Elmo took over. I despise his hypocrisy and his fascist ideas)

    But this could be a "legitimate f-up". Normally, most of these unsafe-url protection and detection is automated in something with the scale of Twitter.

    Just like URL-shorteners often are (were?) "seemingly randomly" banned, because a portion of the shared urls are pointing at malware/phishing/otherwise banned content, all urls from this shortener get banned. It may be that signal.me is simply picking up on amount of illegitimate links. Signal is clearly growing strong. Therefore signal.me links' are increasingly seen by Twitter. Most legitimate links, but the amount of illegitimate links will then also increase.

    This would trigger an automated ban¹.

    The real problem then is that even if it was deliberate (conspiracy theory: Mark messaged Elon: Pls help me curb the growth of the biggest competitor of Whatsapp?) twitter can easily hide behind "overzealous automation, sorry".

    ¹ Especially if this automation isn't maintained properly, finetuned and kept being tweaked by teams of experts – many of which left or were layd off after the aquisition of Twitter.

  • Post Author
    dotdi
    Posted February 17, 2025 at 10:03 am

    Good thing I deleted all my twitter accounts a few weeks ago. Pardon my French, but fuck Elon.

  • Post Author
    akmarinov
    Posted February 17, 2025 at 10:07 am

    So? Who's using Twitter anyway?

  • Post Author
    nanna
    Posted February 17, 2025 at 10:13 am

    Particularly ironic given that DOGE is reported to be using Signal as its comms platform. [1]

    [1] https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=42579873

  • Post Author
    sounddetective
    Posted February 17, 2025 at 10:18 am

    Everyone reading this — sign up for Bluesky, help it build up a larger network effect, so it can outcompete X. It already has 30m users.

  • Post Author
    martin-t
    Posted February 17, 2025 at 10:25 am

    This is what happens when a society allows narcissists in positions of power. It's a disease and when they refuse to seek treatment, it should make them ineligible for any leadership position, in both the private and public sector.

    Nobody (sane) would allow a psychotic individual to run for president or become a CEO. This is the same thing, except they are less of a danger to themselves and more to others.

    And of course they're able to craft more convincing lies. Mr. Musk never cared about free speech, only about being worshipped and the best way to achieve that is to say what people want to hear.

  • Post Author
    buyucu
    Posted February 17, 2025 at 10:25 am

    If you are still using Twitter, thank you are part of the problem.

    Begging Tech bosses to do things is not an effective strategy. Just move to some other platform. It is easy.

  • Post Author
    j-bos
    Posted February 17, 2025 at 10:47 am

    This comment section has turned into something of a circle, it's cool to be mad nd all, but there was a comment expressing doubt at the details, wonder about a reason other than those stated, and asking if anyone independently verified, as I clicked it the comment was flagged to oblivion. No opportunity to engage with that viewpoint.

  • Post Author
    aussieguy1234
    Posted February 17, 2025 at 10:55 am

    It's free speech, but only if Musk approves of it.

  • Post Author
    PedroBatista
    Posted February 17, 2025 at 10:57 am

    Signal could start doing some posts praising Musk and promoting Tesla or whatever scam he’s pushing at the given moment, that would unblock them really fast.

    Pre-Musk Twitter was indeed bad, a sign of it’s time and dying. Now it’s even worse and quite pathetic.

  • Post Author
    karel-3d
    Posted February 17, 2025 at 11:13 am

    I think there should be a pinned post about Elon Musk at the top of HN and all posts and comments about Elon Musk should go there.

  • Post Author
    NicoJuicy
    Posted February 17, 2025 at 11:13 am

    Looking at the thread here.

    Trust in society is being eradicated and that's how authoritarian regimes win.

    Great video to understand what's going on: https://youtu.be/nknYtlOvaQ0?si=1LP6QsbFgIvpfIay

    It's sad

  • Post Author
    JodieBenitez
    Posted February 17, 2025 at 11:22 am

    Some much people commenting about Elon Musk "free speech" declarations. There was never free speech on Twitter. Not before him, not after him.

  • Post Author
    nikolayasdf123
    Posted February 17, 2025 at 11:24 am

    probably to ensure integrity. they need to fight fraud and abuse on a massive scale. nothing to see here

  • Post Author
    redbell
    Posted February 17, 2025 at 11:28 am

    Ironically, three years ago, Musk encouraged the use of Signal and tweeted: Use Signal,
    https://x.com/elonmusk/status/1347165127036977153

  • Post Author
    FergusArgyll
    Posted February 17, 2025 at 11:34 am

    No No, the pictures in the article are deep fakes.

    This is a classic Russian tactic to spread division.

    51 Intelligence Agencies and 31 Nobel Prize winning economists said this is disinformation to make you hate the President.

Leave a comment

In the Shadows of Innovation”

© 2025 HackTech.info. All Rights Reserved.

Sign Up to Our Newsletter

Be the first to know the latest updates

Whoops, you're not connected to Mailchimp. You need to enter a valid Mailchimp API key.