Elon Musk’s social media platform, X, is currently banning links to “Signal.me,” a URL used by the encrypted messaging service Signal. The “Signal.me” domain is specifically used by the service so that users can send out a quick link to directly contact them through the messaging app.
X, formerly Twitter, is blocking users from posting a “Signal.me” link through DM, public post, or even in their profile page. When trying to post a Signal link, users receive a variety of different “message failed” prompts depending on what version of the X platform they use (i.e. X for web, X for iPhone, etc.)
“We can’t complete this request because this link has been identified by X or our partners as being potentially harmful,” reads one failure prompt when attempting to post a “Signal.me” link on X.
“This request looks like it might be automated” reads another prompt. “To protect our users from spam and other malicious activity, we can’t complete this action right now. Please try again later.”
An attempt to add a “Signal.me” link in a profile bio resulted in an error message saying “Account update failed. Description is considered malware.”
X is also blocking users from clicking existing “Signal.me” links published prior to the URL’s ban.
Users who attempt to click on a “Signal.me” link already posted to X are currently met with a warning page from X that reads “Warning: this link may be unsafe. The link you are trying to access has been identified by X or our partners as being potentially spammy or unsafe, in accordance with X’s URL Policy.“ However, users are given the choice to ignore the warning and click an additional link on the warning page to direct to the original “Signal.me” URL.
Its unclear when X blocked “Signal.me” links on the platform. However, it seems like a fairly recent change as users have previously been able to include “Signal.me” links in public posts and in their profile bio. Other Signal links, such as Signal.org, do not appear to be blocked. Only the “Signal.me” URLs which are used to directly contact users through the app appear to be affected.
It appears that Signal is the only service currently affected. Links to other similar third-party services, such as URLs to contact users on Telegram, are allowed on X.
Security researchers at Mysk first noticed the issue on Sunday night, Feb. 16. They reached out to me via DM and we were able to confirm the various different ways (DM, post, profile bio, etc.) that X was blocking “Signal.me” links.
Signal has been an important tool for journalists over the years as really one of the few services that are truly private. All messages are end-to-end encrypted, everything is stored on device, and no content is kept on any Signal servers in the cloud. If a source wants to reach out to a reporter and be sure their communication would be as confidential as po
31 Comments
type_Ben_struct
In my opinion, Elon Musk is the most dangerous man in the world sticky now.
xyzal
Tags like #coup, #protest and so on will be next.
decimalenough
Remember the Arab Spring and how Twitter was hailed as a tool for the masses to fight against their oppressors? And remember how Elon bought Twitter, loudly proclaiming he was doing so to defend free speech?
I'm mildly curious to see how X tries to justify this, but I suspect they've reached the stage where they don't even need to pretend to pay lip service to their notional values.
nubinetwork
It would really cut down on spam/scams if they also blocked links to Instagram, telegram, and the onlyfans redirect sites…
muddi900
I think the only smaet business move for twitter right now is to ban all external links in posts, like Instagram and TikTok.
It was never much of a driver of traffic outside news and most news consumers that click have already left. And most news sources you'd want to click are behind paywalls The users that remain are more likely to watch Twitter videos and read those long-ass tweets, out of loyalty to Papa Elon.
jgaa
So much for Elons "Free Speech"!
This may come as a shock to him: Free Speech means to allow people to say something that he disagree with. Something that may hurt his interests or even his ego. Free speech is not to allow people to say things he agree with or don't care about.
emsign
Ditch Twitter for better alternatives already, it's owned by a man baby that should have never gotten any money from daddy.
benguild
This is incredibly stupid if true
casenmgreen
I came to the view the Twitter purchase was a deliberate move as part of the lead up to Elon being right-hand-man for Donald. It was about buying influence. The cost of the purchase is nothing compared to the power which has been obtained.
I note also I tried to make a Twitter account, to post support to Sassoon, and making an account was being profoundly discouraged – I tried twice, both times was asked to complete ten captchas, about five minutes of pure captcha work.
I suspect this is to block outraged people making new accounts.
maxehmookau
All that free speech is a bit too much for dear Elon apparently.
aeurielesn
Free speech for thee but not for me.
lawgimenez
Deleting my 15 year old Twitter account was one of the best decisions in my life.
neumann
Why is anyone on twitter at this point? If you are still there you are part of the problem.
teekert
[flagged]
kome
Instagram blocked telegram 8 years ago and nobody complained, the ban in still in place as far i know; trying to block the competition is fairly common, unfortunately
berkes
I'm not defending Twitter or their policy in any way (disclaimer: I left Twitter the moment Elmo took over. I despise his hypocrisy and his fascist ideas)
But this could be a "legitimate f-up". Normally, most of these unsafe-url protection and detection is automated in something with the scale of Twitter.
Just like URL-shorteners often are (were?) "seemingly randomly" banned, because a portion of the shared urls are pointing at malware/phishing/otherwise banned content, all urls from this shortener get banned. It may be that signal.me is simply picking up on amount of illegitimate links. Signal is clearly growing strong. Therefore signal.me links' are increasingly seen by Twitter. Most legitimate links, but the amount of illegitimate links will then also increase.
This would trigger an automated ban¹.
The real problem then is that even if it was deliberate (conspiracy theory: Mark messaged Elon: Pls help me curb the growth of the biggest competitor of Whatsapp?) twitter can easily hide behind "overzealous automation, sorry".
¹ Especially if this automation isn't maintained properly, finetuned and kept being tweaked by teams of experts – many of which left or were layd off after the aquisition of Twitter.
dotdi
Good thing I deleted all my twitter accounts a few weeks ago. Pardon my French, but fuck Elon.
akmarinov
So? Who's using Twitter anyway?
nanna
Particularly ironic given that DOGE is reported to be using Signal as its comms platform. [1]
[1] https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=42579873
sounddetective
Everyone reading this — sign up for Bluesky, help it build up a larger network effect, so it can outcompete X. It already has 30m users.
martin-t
This is what happens when a society allows narcissists in positions of power. It's a disease and when they refuse to seek treatment, it should make them ineligible for any leadership position, in both the private and public sector.
Nobody (sane) would allow a psychotic individual to run for president or become a CEO. This is the same thing, except they are less of a danger to themselves and more to others.
And of course they're able to craft more convincing lies. Mr. Musk never cared about free speech, only about being worshipped and the best way to achieve that is to say what people want to hear.
buyucu
If you are still using Twitter, thank you are part of the problem.
Begging Tech bosses to do things is not an effective strategy. Just move to some other platform. It is easy.
j-bos
This comment section has turned into something of a circle, it's cool to be mad nd all, but there was a comment expressing doubt at the details, wonder about a reason other than those stated, and asking if anyone independently verified, as I clicked it the comment was flagged to oblivion. No opportunity to engage with that viewpoint.
aussieguy1234
It's free speech, but only if Musk approves of it.
PedroBatista
Signal could start doing some posts praising Musk and promoting Tesla or whatever scam he’s pushing at the given moment, that would unblock them really fast.
Pre-Musk Twitter was indeed bad, a sign of it’s time and dying. Now it’s even worse and quite pathetic.
karel-3d
I think there should be a pinned post about Elon Musk at the top of HN and all posts and comments about Elon Musk should go there.
NicoJuicy
Looking at the thread here.
Trust in society is being eradicated and that's how authoritarian regimes win.
Great video to understand what's going on: https://youtu.be/nknYtlOvaQ0?si=1LP6QsbFgIvpfIay
It's sad
JodieBenitez
Some much people commenting about Elon Musk "free speech" declarations. There was never free speech on Twitter. Not before him, not after him.
nikolayasdf123
probably to ensure integrity. they need to fight fraud and abuse on a massive scale. nothing to see here
redbell
Ironically, three years ago, Musk encouraged the use of Signal and tweeted: Use Signal,
https://x.com/elonmusk/status/1347165127036977153
FergusArgyll
No No, the pictures in the article are deep fakes.
This is a classic Russian tactic to spread division.
51 Intelligence Agencies and 31 Nobel Prize winning economists said this is disinformation to make you hate the President.