Skip to content Skip to footer
The origins of 60-Hz as a power frequency by theamk

The origins of 60-Hz as a power frequency by theamk

16 Comments

  • Post Author
    ethbr1
    Posted February 7, 2025 at 5:11 pm

    If only we could tag thought threads for submissions. Funny to see this coming out of the Baltic disconnect comment section!

  • Post Author
    antithesis-nl
    Posted February 7, 2025 at 5:15 pm

    (1997), which I wondered about due to the "Many people continue to be affected by the decisions on frequency standards made so very long ago" phrasing and the intro-bit about the need for adapters in the paper itself.

    Because these days, voltage and especially frequency are pretty much irrelevant for mains-power AC, and "ignorant" will be more accurate than "affected" when it comes to "many people"…

  • Post Author
    ej1
    Posted February 7, 2025 at 5:21 pm

    [flagged]

  • Post Author
    rkagerer
    Posted February 7, 2025 at 5:24 pm
  • Post Author
    ethbr1
    Posted February 7, 2025 at 5:31 pm

    Tl;dr – Because Westinghouse (60 Hz) beat out GE (50 Hz) in the early (~1910+) American AC electrical equipment market.

  • Post Author
    Ericson2314
    Posted February 7, 2025 at 5:34 pm

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Amtrak%27s_25_Hz_traction_powe… predates standardized 60 Hz, and still hasn't been converted (!!)

  • Post Author
    alex_young
    Posted February 7, 2025 at 5:44 pm

    60 Hz sure makes it easy to keep clocks on time.

  • Post Author
    UltraSane
    Posted February 7, 2025 at 5:45 pm

    Fun fact: Japan uses BOTH 60Hz and 50Hz for mains electricity due to historical generator purchases. This means the Japanese electric grid is split into two regions that cannot easily share electricity.

  • Post Author
    voxadam
    Posted February 7, 2025 at 6:05 pm

    (1997)

  • Post Author
    1-6
    Posted February 7, 2025 at 6:37 pm

    Duodecimal Society members are happy.

  • Post Author
    pkulak
    Posted February 7, 2025 at 6:59 pm

    I always assumed it's because 60 is a highly composite number (superior, in fact!). It's kinda the best number if you're ever going to need to divide. 50 is kinda garbage in that regard. :/

  • Post Author
    freeqaz
    Posted February 7, 2025 at 7:05 pm

    If we could magically pick a frequency and voltage for electrical systems to use (without sunk costs), what would it be?

    What's the most efficient for modern grids and electronics?

    Would it be a higher frequency (1000hz)?

    I know higher voltage systems are more dangerous but make it easier to transmit more power (toaster ovens in the EU are better because of 240v). I'm curious if we would pick a different voltage too and just have better/safer outlets.

  • Post Author
    cjohnst
    Posted February 7, 2025 at 7:17 pm

    When f is 60Hz, it makes for some nice round numbers, and easier for mental calculations.

    ω=2πf

    At 60Hz, ω is 376.99… very near to the integer 377.

    Also, Z₀, impedance of free space is not far off at 376.73… Ω

  • Post Author
    Aloha
    Posted February 7, 2025 at 7:27 pm

    I know Southern California Edison had 50hz power, I always used to find old clocks and radios as a kid with a conversion sticker.

    I've always kept an eye out for good papers about the effort to convert, but they're hard to find.

  • Post Author
    alana314
    Posted February 7, 2025 at 7:56 pm

    As a result I hear B0 everywhere, in power lines, electric arcs, industrial motors, speaker buzz, etc

  • Post Author
    throw0101c
    Posted February 7, 2025 at 8:37 pm

    Meta: the IEE(E) has been around for a little while. One of the references:

    > [5] L.B. Stillwell, ”Note on Standard Frequency,” IEE Journal, vol. 28, 1899, pp. 364-66.

    That's 126 years ago.

Leave a comment

In the Shadows of Innovation”

© 2025 HackTech.info. All Rights Reserved.

Sign Up to Our Newsletter

Be the first to know the latest updates

Whoops, you're not connected to Mailchimp. You need to enter a valid Mailchimp API key.