ProPublica is a nonprofit newsroom that investigates abuses of power. Sign up to receive our biggest stories as soon as they’re published.
Pregnancy became far more dangerous in Texas after the state banned abortion in 2021, ProPublica found in a first-of-its-kind data analysis.
The rate of sepsis shot up more than 50% for women hospitalized when they lost their pregnancies in the second trimester, ProPublica found.
The surge in this life-threatening condition, caused by infection, was most pronounced for patients whose fetus may still have had a heartbeat when they arrived at the hospital.
ProPublica previously reported on two such cases in which miscarrying women in Texas died of sepsis after doctors delayed evacuating their uteruses. Doing so would have been considered an abortion.
The new reporting shows that, after the state banned abortion, dozens more pregnant and postpartum women died in Texas hospitals than had in pre-pandemic years, which ProPublica used as a baseline to avoid COVID-19-related distortions. As the maternal mortality rate dropped nationally, ProPublica found, it rose substantially in Texas.
ProPublica’s analysis is the most detailed look yet at a rise in life-threatening complications for women losing a pregnancy after Texas banned abortion. It raises concerns that the same pattern may be occurring in more than a dozen other states with similar bans.
To chart the scope of pregnancy-related infections, ProPublica purchased and analyzed seven years of Texas’ hospital discharge data.
“This is exactly what we predicted would happen and exactly what we were afraid would happen,” said Dr. Lorie Harper, a maternal-fetal medicine specialist in Austin.
She and a dozen other maternal health experts who reviewed ProPublica’s findings say they add to the evidence that the state’s abortion ban is leading to dangerous delays in care. Texas law threatens up to 99 years in prison for providing an abortion. Though the ban includes an exception for a “medical emergency,” the definition of what constitutes an emergency has been subject to confusion and debate.
Many said the ban is the only explanation they could see for the sudden jump in sepsis cases.
The new analysis comes as Texas legislators consider amending the abortion ban in the wake of ProPublica’s previous reporting, and as doctors, federal lawmakers and the state’s largest newspaper have urged Texas officials to review pregnancy-related deaths from the first full years after the ban was enacted; the state maternal mortality review committee has, thus far, opted not to examine the death data for 2022 and 2023.
The standard of care for miscarrying patients in the second trimester is to offer to empty the uterus, according to leading medical organizations, which can lower the risk of contracting an infection and developing sepsis. If a patient’s water breaks or her cervix opens, that risk rises with every passing hour.
Sepsis can lead to permanent kidney failure, brain damage and dangerous blood clotting. Nationally, it is one of the leading causes of deaths in hospitals.
While some Texas doctors have told ProPublica they regularly offer to empty the uterus in these cases, others say their hospitals don’t allow them to do so until the fetal heartbeat stops or they can document a life-threatening complication.
Last year, ProPublica reported on the repercussions of these kinds of delays.
Forced to wait 40 hours as her dying fetus pressed against her cervix, Josseli Barnica risked a dangerous infection. Doctors didn’t induce labor until her fetus no longer had a heartbeat.
Physicians waited, too, as Nevaeh Crain’s organs failed. Before rushing the pregnant teenager to the operating room, they ran an extra test to confirm her fetus had expired.
Both women had hoped to carry their pregnancies to term, both suffered miscarriages and both died.
What We’re Watching
During Donald Trump’s second presidency, ProPublica will focus on the areas most in need of scrutiny. Here are some of the issues our reporters will be watching — and how to get in touch with them securely.
If you don’t have a specific tip or story in mind, we could still use your help. Sign up to be a member of our federal worker source network to stay in touch.
We’re trying something new. Was it helpful?
In response to their stories, 111 doctors wrote a letter to the Legislature saying the abortion ban kept them from providing lifesaving care and demanding a change.
“It’s black and white in the law, but it’s very vague when you’re in the moment,” said Dr. Tony Ogburn, an OB-GYN in San Antonio. When the fetus has a heartbeat, doctors can’t simply follow the usual evidence-based guidelines, he said. Instead, there is a legal obligation to assess whether a woman’s condition is dire enough to merit an abortion under a prosecutor’s interpretation of the law.
Some prominent Texas Republicans who helped write and pass Texas’ strict abortion bans have recently said that the law should be changed to protect women’s lives — though it’s unclear if proposed amendments will receive a public hearing during the current legislative s
11 Comments
drawkward
[flagged]
gallamine
Just a note that they're comparing 5 data points to 2 datapoints and advocating for life-altering policy change.
jisnsm
Surely there must be a middle ground between allowing free abortion and having women die of sepsis.
For those not reading, the number goes from 67 to 99 – make of that what you will.
Xunjin
I did two years of nurse graduation, and one of the discussions that we had in Public Health classes was that Abortion will be done whether you think it is ethical/moral or not. It's time to start treating this from a scientific perspective to avoid the life losses, this procedure done in a clandestine clinic is a high-risk life threat for the Mother.
It's clear, in the Health community, that pregnancy can be avoided with contraceptives and instructing the population (adults and teenagers) on how to deal with this issue.
Not only that, but it's tragic that we have such a good organization, WHO, which does instruct on how to deal with this, and yet we ignore because of beliefs of “pro-life” movements which in the end kill the infant's mother.
emorning3
[flagged]
zzzeek
Here's my post from April 2023 flagged as "misinformation" where I state exactly the premise shown to be true by this study, followed by repeated badgering and threats that I was "spreading misinformation" breaking site rules:
https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=35461613
noteabthiring
This is a state with no exception for rape or incest, and castle doctrine and stand your ground rights to self defense.
Forcing a raped woman to carry to term and parent for life exceeds the sentencing guidelines. When the state abuses the citizen beyond the sentencing guidelines, the citizen has the right to self defense using at least equal force.
That is, don't persons denied abortions by the state have the right to trap their abusers into parenting a reminder of their trauma for life, in self defense?
"Just put your kid up for adoption, to please God."
In 2024, there were 391,098 kids in foster care hoping to be adopted or age out of the system. There are demographic breakdown by race(s) and preference(s).
**
It would not please a benevolent God to trap rape victims with a reminder of their trauma for life!
It would not please a benevolent God to force children into a life of resentment and neglect!
Is there a benevolent God? Not in law, no.
Should the court admit that:
God designed that humans would be the genetically disadvantaged incestuous products of Adam and his daughter Eve and their children?
Genesis (Bible Chapter 1): Adam and Eve begat Cain and Abel, and then they violently fought and Cain slew Abel, but the third child was fine (*).
Why must the church track genetic relations, in God's design? Isn't it criminally abusive to teach kids in public school that we're all the products of incest, which survived after God's drowning genocidal wrath toward God's own creations?
Is it morally acceptable for God to drown everyone on Earth to fix God's design and keep testing free will?
If God was qualified to be teaching about medical PPD, God should have instructed humans to wash their hands before delivering babies* instead of instructing them to spread Kaneh Bosm (Holy Anointing Oil) all over the tabernacle or manger.)
In 1865-1867 AD/CE,
Joseph Lister discovered that sanitizing surgical instruments with carbolic acid – an antiseptic to prevent sepsis – reduced the number of post-surgical infections, amputations, and deaths.
What has law, for childbirth and God?
josefritzishere
Maga is the road to death, poverty and plague.
lenerdenator
This sort of legislation will continue to be passed across the nation until a consequence is introduced.
TaurenHunter
https://projects.propublica.org/the-year-after-a-denied-abor…
ProPublica is the type of media that publishes photos of babies under the caption "a denied abortion".
Not only that: they even got $5M from Sam Bankman-Fried's massive scheme of fraud.
aSithLord
Im sure this has nothing to do with the millions of illegals that began parading into the USA when pudding brain was innagurated as president in 2021..