%PDF-1.6 %âãÏÓ 221 0 obj endobj 241 0 obj /Filter/FlateDecode/ID[]/Index[221 30]/Info 220 0 R/Length 96/Prev 227559/Root 222 0 R/Size 251/Type/XRef/W[1 3 1]>>stream hÞbbd“`b“Î3À$7XÄD2- hÙ¼`²L²I)0É &Áº² ²tLRɲ`v
Business reporters and talking heads are tripping over themselves to predict the next bubble. It’s the least they can do after so many of them fueled the dot-com and real-estate booms and busts that tanked the economy and robbed millions of Americans of their hard-earned (or at least borrowed) money. Many have identified higher education
So the Supreme Court has handed down a decision rejecting race-conscious admissions policies for universities. See if you can guess which of the following headlines was from Fox News, and which was from NPR:“Supreme Court rejects affirmative action in ruling on universities using race in admissions decisions”“Supreme Court guts affirmative action, effectively ending race-conscious admissions”Joe
Getty Images | BushAlex The song lyrics website Genius’ allegations that Google “stole” its work in violation of a contract will not be heard by the US Supreme Court. The top US court denied Genius’ petition for certiorari in an order list issued today, leaving in place lower-court rulings that went in Google’s favor. Genius
OPINION ANALYSIS By Amy Howe on May 18, 2023 at 1:03 pm The Twitter headquarters in San Francisco, Calif. (Phil Pasquini via Shutterstock) The Supreme Court on Thursday ruled against the family of a 2017 ISIS attack victim who sought to hold tech companies liable for allowing ISIS to use their platforms in its terrorism
TechSpot is about to celebrate its 25th anniversary. TechSpot means tech analysis and advice you can trust. A hot potato: The ability of artificial intelligence to create pretty much anything these days is astounding, but who owns the rights to their creations? A computer scientist who tried to patent inventions made by his AI has had the
Justices acquitted themselves well during oral arguments on two pivotal cases this week.Joanne Imperio / The AtlanticFebruary 24, 2023, 7 AM ETFor the first time, the Supreme Court is considering its opinion on the brief but powerful “26 words that created the internet.”Enacted in 1996, Section 230 of the Communications Decency Act immunizes online platforms
from the a-toast-to-230 dept Next week, the Supreme Court will hold the oral arguments in the Gonzalez and Taamneh cases. Gonzalez is the main show (and I’m somewhat surprised they didn’t have the hearings on the same day). There were dozens upon dozens of amicus briefs filed in the case, including one by us. There
When the Supreme Court hears a landmark case on Section 230 later in February, all eyes will be on the biggest players in tech—Meta, Google, Twitter, YouTube. A legal provision tucked into the Communications Decency Act, Section 230 has provided the foundation for Big Tech’s explosive growth, protecting social platforms from lawsuits over harmful user-generated
May the United States rule foreign territories without granting their inhabitants constitutional rights? Yes, according to landmark Supreme Court decisions in the “Insular Cases” more than a century ago. Without those decisions, our overseas territorial empire could not have existed.Suddenly that decision is under fierce attack from within the Court itself. The fate of America’s…