Skip to content Skip to footer
0 items - $0.00 0

Monster Cables picked the wrong guy to threaten (2008) by wallflower

Monster Cables picked the wrong guy to threaten (2008) by wallflower

Monster Cables picked the wrong guy to threaten (2008) by wallflower

23 Comments

  • Post Author
    biglyburrito
    Posted March 22, 2025 at 12:35 am
  • Post Author
    schumpeter
    Posted March 22, 2025 at 1:58 am

    You have to wonder what it is with companies having “monster” in their names that makes them such monsters.

    This story reminded me of the multi-year battle by Monster energy going after MonsterFishKeepers.com

    https://reefbuilders.com/2016/03/01/monster-fish-keepers-win…

  • Post Author
    stego-tech
    Posted March 22, 2025 at 2:06 am

    It was this story that clued me into BJC as an entity in the first place. Gladly shelled out a couple hundred bucks for solidly-built custom speaker interconnects a few years later with them, and have zero regrets.

    As far as legal tactics go, I’m very sympathetic to his position and wish more folks would fight to the finish instead of settling for nuisance values.

  • Post Author
    ocdtrekkie
    Posted March 22, 2025 at 2:12 am

    So I clicked the first link to read about the actual claim, and I was floored by the author bio at the bottom: "Clint Deboer was terminated from Audioholics for misconduct on April 4th, 2014. He no longer represents Audioholics in any fashion."

    Gotta wonder how bad you gotta screw up to have your byline on every article you wrote permanently set to that.

  • Post Author
    bschmidt700
    Posted March 22, 2025 at 2:29 am

    [flagged]

  • Post Author
    bschmidt702
    Posted March 22, 2025 at 2:31 am

    [flagged]

  • Post Author
    RustyRussell
    Posted March 22, 2025 at 2:32 am

    OK, the whole "I am a lawyer" was next-levelled by this closing sentence: "Not only am I unintimidated by litigation; I sometimes rather miss it."

  • Post Author
    walrus01
    Posted March 22, 2025 at 2:37 am

    Previously, monster cable vs. using a coat hanger for a speaker wire.

    https://www.google.com/search?client=firefox-b-e&channel=ent…

  • Post Author
    chrisweekly
    Posted March 22, 2025 at 2:51 am

    All bullies are cowards.

  • Post Author
    kazinator
    Posted March 22, 2025 at 3:00 am

    I'm thinking, what are the odds that the president of some boutique audio cable company would be a litigator.

  • Post Author
    tqi
    Posted March 22, 2025 at 3:13 am

    Monster Cables is a name I hadn't thought about in ages… I mostly remember them as the company that tried to convince people that digital images would look better via a more expensive cable.

  • Post Author
    CalChris
    Posted March 22, 2025 at 3:17 am

    Reminds me of when Caterpillar (trucks+tractors) sued Cat and Cloud Coffee (coffee) in Santa Cruz for trademark infringement.

    https://www.ksbw.com/article/cat-and-cloud-coffee-in-santa-c…

  • Post Author
    bschmidt812
    Posted March 22, 2025 at 3:32 am

    [flagged]

  • Post Author
    npunt
    Posted March 22, 2025 at 3:43 am

    In my head canon Monster Cables pivoted to become Monster Energy and justified it to shareholders as 'we're still in the business of getting people wired'

  • Post Author
    jaredandrews
    Posted March 22, 2025 at 3:47 am

    I had no idea Monster sold anything other than over priced guitar cables… About 15 yeard ago, I knew a guy who exclusively bought Monster… well he had two of them, one from the guitar to the pedal board and another from the board to the amp.

    But it wasn't because of their alleged improved sound quality or whatever, it was because they had a lifetime warranty. Dude had bought two monster 1/4inch cables and gotten them replaced "for free" like 5 times.

    From what I can tell they got rid of the lifetime warranty around 2018 and have mostly transitioned to licensing their name.

  • Post Author
    ghshephard
    Posted March 22, 2025 at 3:53 am

    I read the letter and it looked like pretty much the first negotiating position of any lawyer. Regardless of what you think, convince the opposition that you are prepared to litigate to the end of time.

  • Post Author
    bschmidt906
    Posted March 22, 2025 at 3:55 am

    [flagged]

  • Post Author
    m463
    Posted March 22, 2025 at 4:32 am

    I remember buying audio gear (think receiver, amplifier, cd player) and being the focus of the upsell for 2-5x more expensive monster cables.

    Once I patiently explained that a cable shouldn't matter for digital as long as the bits got there, and seeing the young sales guy pause and then "get it". And I got the (relatively) cheap cables.

    Also speaker wire. You can get perfectly good copper cables for less, probably in a thicker gauge wire.

  • Post Author
    bschmidt986
    Posted March 22, 2025 at 4:42 am

    [flagged]

  • Post Author
    hagen_dogs
    Posted March 22, 2025 at 5:17 am

    grok copypasta:

    What the fuck did you just fucking say about my intellectual property, you little bitch? I’ll have you know I graduated top of my class at the University of Pennsylvania Law School in 1985, and I’ve been involved in numerous federal litigations over 19 years, with a focus on large damages and complex issues. I am trained in courtroom warfare, and I’m one of the top attorneys in dismantling meritless claims. Your accusations are nothing to me but just another frivolous threat. I will shred your case with precision the likes of which has never been seen in a court of law, mark my fucking words.

    You think you can get away with sending me this hit-and-run demand letter over the Internet? Think again, fucker. As we speak, I am compiling my legal defenses and gathering evidence to expose the gaping holes in your so-called claims, so you better prepare for the legal storm, sir. It’s the storm that wipes out the pathetic little thing you call your lawsuit. Your case is fucking dead. I can counter your arguments anywhere, anytime—in depositions, motions, or trial—and I can dismantle your position in over seven hundred ways, and that’s just with my bare legal expertise.

    Not only am I extensively trained in litigation, but I have access to a vast network of legal resources and experts, honed over a quarter-century of practice. I will deploy the full force of the law to defend my rights and bury your baseless allegations. If only you could have known what unholy retribution your little ‘clever’ cease-and-desist was about to bring down upon you, maybe you would have held your fucking pen. But you couldn’t, you didn’t, and now you’re paying the price, you goddamn idiot. I will unleash a fury of merits-driven arguments all over you, and you will drown in them. Your case is fucking dead, sir.

    I am uncompromising—literally. I spent my first seven years in defense practice, watching insurance carriers cave to nuisance settlements, and it pissed me off. As a plaintiff’s advocate, I took cases to judgment even when fat settlement checks were on the table. I’d rather spend fifty thousand dollars fighting your bullying ass in court than give you a single cent of unmerited settlement funds. You think you can intimidate me with your Monster Cable modus operandi—threaten, negotiate, license, repeat? Think again. There are only two ways you’re getting anything out of me: (1) convince me I’ve infringed with actual evidence, or (2) get a final judgment from a court. Good luck with that. If you sue me, I’ll drag this to judgment, holding the court’s attention on the utter lack of merit in your claims from start to finish. Not only am I unintimidated by litigation—I fucking miss it sometimes.

  • Post Author
    acobster
    Posted March 22, 2025 at 5:22 am

    Perhaps the coolest way I've ever seen someone say "I'd love to see you try."

  • Post Author
    dkh
    Posted March 22, 2025 at 5:40 am

    I want to be this man when I grow up

  • Post Author
    noduerme
    Posted March 22, 2025 at 6:33 am

    >> developed an intense frustration with insurance carriers who would settle meritless claims for nuisance value when the better long-term view would have been to fight against vexatious litigation as a matter of principle

    I got let out of 2-3 months of jury duty on an asbestos case by saying basically the same thing. Voir dire is fun, particularly if you manage to scare the bejezus out of both sides.

Leave a comment

In the Shadows of Innovation”

© 2025 HackTech.info. All Rights Reserved.

Sign Up to Our Newsletter

Be the first to know the latest updates

Whoops, you're not connected to Mailchimp. You need to enter a valid Mailchimp API key.