Skip to content Skip to footer
0 items - $0.00 0

Intel sells 51% stake in Altera to private equity firm on a $8.75B valuation by voxadam

Intel sells 51% stake in Altera to private equity firm on a $8.75B valuation by voxadam

Intel sells 51% stake in Altera to private equity firm on a $8.75B valuation by voxadam

16 Comments

  • Post Author
    bigfatkitten
    Posted April 14, 2025 at 10:16 pm

    It was a silly acquisition in the first place, and their justification clearly came from a coke-addled fever dream.

    Intel soon discovered the obvious, which is that customers with applications well-suited to FPGAs already use FPGAs.

  • Post Author
    Alupis
    Posted April 14, 2025 at 10:21 pm

    I wonder if we'll see more Intel sell-offs, as Tan et al try to get things under control.

    Will we see an AMD-esque fab spin-off?

  • Post Author
    rsp1984
    Posted April 14, 2025 at 10:25 pm

    Should change title. They sold 51% at a valuation of $8.75B, so cash in is ~ $4.29B.

  • Post Author
    mastax
    Posted April 14, 2025 at 10:26 pm

    Intel acquired Altera in December 2015 for $16.7 billion in cash.

  • Post Author
    thot_experiment
    Posted April 14, 2025 at 10:27 pm

    Rest in Peace Altera I guess? I still drink out of my color changing Altera mug (that's long stopped changing color) most days. PE ruins everything so it's only a matter of time before they're gutted and sold for scraps by the vultures at Silver Lake. (though honestly the writing was on the wall since the Intel acquisition I had held onto some hope) If only we had a functioning government interested in actually maintaining our technological dominance and enforcing/expanding antitrust legislation. I wrote my first Verilog on an Altera chip and I'll remember them fondly.

  • Post Author
    svnt
    Posted April 14, 2025 at 10:30 pm

    For those keeping score at home, 51% sold at a total valuation of $8.75B, which means they are bringing in around $4.5B, and recognizing a loss of roughly 50% on what was their biggest deal ever when it took place in 2015.

  • Post Author
    roughly
    Posted April 14, 2025 at 10:32 pm

    Without arguing the merits of the Altera investment or divestment, a common pattern for Intel seems to be a wild see-sawing between an aggressive and a defensive market posture – it’s a regular occurrence for Intel to announce a bold new venture to try to claim some new territory, and just as regular that they announce they’re halting that venture in the name of “consolidating” and “focusing on their core.” The consequence is that they never give new ventures time to actually succeed, so they just bleed money creating things they murder in the cradle, and nobody born before last Tuesday is investing in bothering to learn the new Intel thing because its expected lifespan is shorter than the average Google product.

    Intel either needs to focus or they need to be bold (and I’d actually prefer they be bold – they’ve started down some cool paths over time), but what they really need is to make up their goddamn minds and stop panicking every other quarter that their “ten-year bets” from last quarter haven’t paid off yet.

  • Post Author
    matt3210
    Posted April 14, 2025 at 10:37 pm

    Intel's problem is that they're trying to deliver short term shareholder value instead of long term stable value.

  • Post Author
    Jach
    Posted April 14, 2025 at 10:39 pm

    Man I remember being excited when Intel bought Altera, maybe they'd bring FPGAs to the masses, then they proceeded to do nothing with them…

  • Post Author
    varispeed
    Posted April 14, 2025 at 10:41 pm

    Seems quite cheap. If I was a state I'd buy it. Possibly give stake to the suitable university and then create internships and other learning opportunities. I would also subsidise products to SMEs and then invest more to ensure company can supply defence and other industries, decoupling the country from dependence on other countries from crucial tech.

    I mean it's a pipe dream, but why not.

  • Post Author
    bjourne
    Posted April 14, 2025 at 10:55 pm

    Apparently, the FPGA industry wasn't large enough for two major players. Maintaining an extremely specialized developer ecosystem for a relatively small niche can't have been cheap. Almost zero cross-over too, since FPGA tooling is much too foreign to be repurposed for other architectures. I suspect this move will make it a bit harder for Intel to collect "developer mindshare" for their other hyped up stuff because no one likes having the rug pulled out from under them. Hope AMD can make a better job with Xilinx than what Intel could with Altera.

  • Post Author
    Calwestjobs
    Posted April 14, 2025 at 11:18 pm

    Anyone who hoped Lunar Lake to buy Altera give thumbs up.

  • Post Author
    mmmBacon
    Posted April 14, 2025 at 11:19 pm

    When Intel acquired Altera, Altera’s market share was at 36% and Xilinx at 51%. Today Xilinx remains at ~50% while Altera’s share has dropped to 29%. Altera has lost share to Microchip and Lattice.

    I’ve said it before, Intel is where technology companies go to die. Fortunately while Altera is probably a mess of useless Intel drone MBAs, there’s a decent core that can be salvaged. Best of luck to them.

  • Post Author
    d-moon
    Posted April 14, 2025 at 11:20 pm

    As someone who's worked at Xilinx before and after the merger, it's a surprise they were even able to sell it for that much. Altera has been noncompetitive to Xilinx in performance and to Lattice in terms of low-end/low-power offerings for at least the last 2 generations.

    I'm concerned about the future of FPGAs and wonder who will lead the way to fix these abhorrent toolchains these FPGA companies force upon developers.

  • Post Author
    sandworm101
    Posted April 14, 2025 at 11:25 pm

    I cannot help myself. My brain parks "Altera" right beside the Weyland and Jupiter Mining corps.

    https://subnautica.fandom.com/wiki/Alterra_Corporation

  • Post Author
    ACAVJW4H
    Posted April 14, 2025 at 11:32 pm

    Quick search shows Altera held 30% of the FPGA market. That puts AMD’s $50B acquisition of Xilinx (which holds ~50% of the market) in an awkward light. Using some extremely crude math, Xilinx’s fair market value might now be closer to ~$15B.

    Did AMD massively overpay, or has the FPGA market fundamentally shifted? Curious to see how this new benchmark ripples into AMD’s stock valuation.

Leave a comment

In the Shadows of Innovation”

© 2025 HackTech.info. All Rights Reserved.

Sign Up to Our Newsletter

Be the first to know the latest updates

Whoops, you're not connected to Mailchimp. You need to enter a valid Mailchimp API key.