Skip to content Skip to footer
0 items - $0.00 0

DOJ: Google must sell Chrome, Android could be next by uxjw

DOJ: Google must sell Chrome, Android could be next by uxjw

DOJ: Google must sell Chrome, Android could be next by uxjw

23 Comments

  • Post Author
    gnabgib
    Posted March 10, 2025 at 6:03 pm

    Discussion (467 points, 2 days ago, 651 comments) https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=43299886

  • Post Author
    kristopolous
    Posted March 10, 2025 at 6:22 pm

    I guess Elon Musk is working on a web browser and a bunch of put options were put on Google.

    Let's be real, this administration is just doing stock manipulations and looting the public purse while running a media circus to distract people.

  • Post Author
    jcranmer
    Posted March 10, 2025 at 6:23 pm

    IMHO, the real issue with Google isn't the control of the web browser, but the complete vertical integration of the ad space. Divest Google of its position as the ad broker (i.e., unwind its acquisition of DoubleClick), and prohibit any sort of privileged data flow from Google to ex-Google Ads, and you'd probably have a more viable solution than the poking DoJ is trying to do right now.

  • Post Author
    iptq
    Posted March 10, 2025 at 6:24 pm

    This headline seems misleading; the way I'm reading this, it's still just a request to the courts, who will make the final decision right?

  • Post Author
    staplung
    Posted March 10, 2025 at 6:27 pm

    Honest question: who are the potential realistic buyers of Chrome? OS vendors already have their own browsers and Chrome doesn't directly make much (any?) money.

  • Post Author
    mentalgear
    Posted March 10, 2025 at 6:28 pm

    Let's wait how long it takes for Trump's crypto / meme coin to get a spike and this DOJ thing to go away. After all, all is transactional with Trump.

  • Post Author
    bobajeff
    Posted March 10, 2025 at 6:28 pm

    I think Google should just be split up into baby Google's that each have to cooperate with each other. Like we did with Bell. Also we should do the same thing to Microsoft, Amazon and Facebook. In fact I think we should do it again to AT&T and also Comcast. This should probably be done every so often as maintenance.

  • Post Author
    2OEH8eoCRo0
    Posted March 10, 2025 at 6:31 pm

    Can we go back to buying software? This free software subsidized by big ad money has fucked the whole market up.

  • Post Author
    seanhunter
    Posted March 10, 2025 at 6:32 pm

    Feel like splitting ad sales from search is the one meaningful structural change they could insist upon that would actually make a difference to Google's monopoly position. Anything like this is really more window-dressing than anything.

  • Post Author
    dbg31415
    Posted March 10, 2025 at 6:41 pm

    This is so dumb.

    Look, I hate how dominant Chrome is. It’s basically a glorified data vacuum for Google—and it’s only getting worse. But at the end of the day, people choose to use Chrome, and I don’t see why Google shouldn’t be allowed to own and develop it. There are still plenty of other browsers people can switch to.

    Now, what’s actually dangerous is the growing trend of sites blocking non-Google search engines from indexing their content. That’s a real issue—and it’s escalating fast. Selling Chrome won’t do a damn thing to fix that.

    Besides, no other company has the budget or incentive to maintain Chrome at the level Google does. If they’re forced to give it up, then what? A half-baked, underfunded mess? A fragmented ecosystem? None of this feels like a win.

    … unless your goal is to have Elon be able to pick up a new browser to go along with Twitter and TickTock.

  • Post Author
    jmyeet
    Posted March 10, 2025 at 6:43 pm

    I have no idea how a for-profit company can exist that solely produces a browser.

    There's only one model that can work long-term here: collective ownership. The closest model is probably the Wikimedia Foundation. Firefox and the Mozilla Foundation are here, obviously, but they've tried to act like a corporation with rising costs and lower earnings going over years. The money Google pays them is basically poison.

    Linux has survived and thrived with something analagous to this but it's also dependent to an unsettling degree on one person (Linus Torvalds). I realize his power has decentralized over the years (intentionally, by Linus) but there's still the constnat risk of a schism.

    Google and Chrome is just one small part of the problem. Apple's Safari monopoly on iOS is also a problem. Browsers really need to be a common good.

    I suspect none of this will happen. Even though these efforts began in the Biden administration, I suspect this will now become a shakedown. This administration will look to Google to fall in line and kiss the ring. That is now the cost of doing business.

  • Post Author
    pton_xd
    Posted March 10, 2025 at 6:49 pm

    The article mentions "Trump's DOJ" but in actuality the DOJ has been building a case against Google since at least 2021 [0].

    [0] https://www.justice.gov/atr/case/us-and-plaintiff-states-v-g…

  • Post Author
    SirMaster
    Posted March 10, 2025 at 6:51 pm

    But would these services even be financially viable as separate entities?

    How does Chrome make income? Isn't it basically developed at a loss, but it makes money for Google's other business units?

  • Post Author
    shadowtree
    Posted March 10, 2025 at 6:54 pm

    Man, I hope they break out Google Business apps.

    The artificial price point for GMail, GDocs, GMeet has killed so much competition.

    Try pricing something against this insane dumping price Google sets – there is no TAM, the M does not payback enough to justify the effort.

    The cross-financing with Ads would finally stop and fair pricing would come.

  • Post Author
    gjsman-1000
    Posted March 10, 2025 at 7:02 pm

    Personally, I’m increasingly looking into native app development; maybe starting with iOS.

    It’s good to have a diversified portfolio of skills, and if Chrome should be sold and not sustainable, there is the possibility that the rollout of new features to the web will feel like an Internet Explorer era malaise. The web may very well become a mostly frozen platform; warts and all.

    I’m also not interested in following the inevitable JavaScript framework attempts to overcome this. At least this time, we have Web Components, WASM, and Canvas, making polyfilling almost anything theoretically possible.

  • Post Author
    ApolloFortyNine
    Posted March 10, 2025 at 7:03 pm

    Honestly I don't care if Google gets broken up, so long as Apple is first.

    People complain about whataboutism, but the Apple versus almost any other 'monopoly' is insane. You can switch browsers within the next 30s, you can't install an app from a third party vendor ever on iOS. [1]

    [1] Yes I know you can pay $100 a year, and then compile your own/open source apps weekly and move them to your device. No this is not a reasonable solution.

  • Post Author
    favorited
    Posted March 10, 2025 at 7:07 pm

    In a completely unrelated story, the #1 post on HN at the moment is "uBlock Origin is no longer available on the Chrome Store" <https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=43322922>

  • Post Author
    exabrial
    Posted March 10, 2025 at 7:10 pm

    Good! Next: Android, YouTube

  • Post Author
    bdcravens
    Posted March 10, 2025 at 7:11 pm

    A point that is often overlooked in discussions of this, which seems huge: they would also be banned from buying search engine dominance (as in, the primary source of Mozilla's revenue).

    "Similarly, Google would be prevented from pressuring its partners to use Google search or AI services over the competition."

  • Post Author
    butz
    Posted March 10, 2025 at 7:15 pm

    How about we raise some money and buy Chrome for the users? First order of business will be removing all privacy invading "features" and re-enabling Manifest V2. If somehow we'll have some cash left, we might even contract Igalia to build blocker right into browser.

  • Post Author
    mushufasa
    Posted March 10, 2025 at 7:19 pm

    My guess is this may go to the Cloud Native Computing Foundation, Linux Foundation, or other industry consortium, since Chromium is already an industry standard and that structure would enable Google et al to continue to directly employ the developer teams currently working on it.

  • Post Author
    bhewes
    Posted March 10, 2025 at 7:30 pm

    Ah yes Internet Explorer all over again. boring.

  • Post Author
    kweingar
    Posted March 10, 2025 at 7:31 pm

    I wonder who would buy "Chromium with a Google skin." You'd get a massive user base, but what would you do with the product? The only thing that distinguishes it from other Chromium-based browsers is integration with Google account features, which doesn't seem useful for a non-Google company.

    Buying Chromium is a more interesting proposition, but you can't really "buy" it (aside from the trademark, infrastructure, domains) because the codebase isn't Google's to sell. Would the web coalesce around the new owners just because they inherit the CI and the repo?

Leave a comment

In the Shadows of Innovation”

© 2025 HackTech.info. All Rights Reserved.

Sign Up to Our Newsletter

Be the first to know the latest updates

Whoops, you're not connected to Mailchimp. You need to enter a valid Mailchimp API key.