
Dimension 126 Contains Twisted Shapes, Mathematicians Prove by baruchel
It can be tempting to assume that your intuitions about three-dimensional space carry over to higher-dimensional realms. After all, adding another dimension simply creates a new direction to move around in. It doesn’t change the defining features of space: its endlessness and its uniformity.
But different dimensions have decidedly different personalities. In dimensions 8 and 24, it’s possible to pack balls together especially tightly. In other dimensions, there are “exotic” spheres that look irremediably crumpled. And dimension 3 is the only one that can contain knots — in any higher dimension, you can untangle a knot even while holding its ends fast.
Now, mathematicians have put the finishing touches on a story of dimensional weirdness that has been 65 years in the making. For many decades, researchers have wanted to know which dimensions can host particularly strange shapes — ones so twisted that they cannot be converted into a sphere through a simple procedure called surgery. The existence of these shapes, mathematicians have shown, is intimately intertwined with fundamental questions in topology about the relationships between spheres of different dimensions.
Over the years, mathematicians found that the twisted shapes exist in dimensions 2, 6, 14, 30 and 62. They also showed that such shapes could not possibly exist in any other dimension — save one. No one could determine the status of dimension 126.
Three mathematicians have now settled this final problem. In a paper posted online last December, Weinan Lin and Guozhen Wang of Fudan University in Shanghai, along with Zhouli Xu of the University of California, Los Angeles, proved that 126 is indeed one of the rare dimensions that can host these strangely twisted shapes.
It’s “a very long program, finally finished,” said Ulrike Tillmann of the University of Oxford.
The proof, which use
10 Comments
uxhacker
I’m not a mathematician (just a programmer), but reading this made me wonder—doesn’t this kind of dimensional weirdness feel a bit like how LLMs organize their internal space? Like how similar ideas or meanings seem to get pulled close together in a way that’s hard to visualize, but clearly works?
That bit in the article about knots only existing in 3D really caught my attention. "And dimension 3 is the only one that can contain knots — in any higher dimension, you can untangle a knot even while holding its ends fast."
That’s so unintuitive… and I can't help thinking of how LLMs seem to "untangle" language meaning in some weird embedding space that’s way beyond anything we can picture.
Is there a real connection here? Or am I just seeing patterns where there aren’t any?
elpocko
The "Mathematical Surgery" illustration is funny. Mathematicians can make a sphere from a torus and two halves of a sphere. Amazing!
bee_rider
Is it conventional for mathematicians to talk about “the dimensions” like this? I think they are talking about a 126 dimensional space here, but I am a lowly computerer, so maybe this went over my head.
zchrykng
Seeing as mathematicians proving things in math has minimal relation to the real world, I'm not sure how important this is.
Mathematicians and physicists have been speculating about the universe having more than 4 dimensions, and/or our 4 dimensional space existing as some kind of film on a higher dimensional space for ages, but I've yet to see compelling proof that any of that is the case.
Edit: To be clear, I'm not attempting to minimize the accomplishment of these specific people. More observing that advanced mathematics seems only tangentially related to reality.
kiicia
> Mathematicians Weinan Lin, Guozhen Wang, and Zhouli Xu have proven that 126-dimensional space can contain exotic, twisted shapes known as manifolds with a Kervaire invariant of 1—solving a 65-year-old problem in topology. These manifolds, previously known to exist only in dimensions 2, 6, 14, 30, and 62, cannot be smoothed into spheres and were the last possible case under what’s called the “doomsday hypothesis.” Their existence in dimension 126 was confirmed using both theoretical insights and complex computer calculations, marking a major milestone in the study of high-dimensional geometric structures.
lifefeed
Well, shit.
anthk
Network optimizing problems are just better with 4D hypercubes.
ReptileMan
>And dimension 3 is the only one that can contain knots — in any higher dimension, you can untangle a knot even while holding its ends fast.
Do we have anything in the universe that is knotted? Both on large and small scales. Or it is just coincidence?
m3kw9
This is some Dr Strange stuff
impish9208
This got me thinking — is there a version of “in mice” for math papers?