Skip to content Skip to footer
0 items - $0.00 0

Albert Einstein’s theory of relativity in words of four letters or less by signa11

Albert Einstein’s theory of relativity in words of four letters or less by signa11

8 Comments

  • Post Author
    crooked-v
    Posted April 14, 2025 at 6:30 am

    People talk about the 'good old days' of the web, but boy, in a multi-tab environment it stucks to try and read something that doesn't put any effort at all into side margins.

  • Post Author
    hkmaxpro
    Posted April 14, 2025 at 6:43 am

    Reminds me of Yasha Berchenko-Kogan’s excellent answer to the question “What do grad students in math do all day?”

    https://www.quora.com/Mathematics/What-do-grad-students-in-m…

    > a bit like trying to explain a vacuum cleaner to someone who has never seen one, except you're only allowed to use words that are four letters long or shorter.

    > What can you say?

    > "It is a tool that does suck up dust to make what you walk on in a home tidy."

  • Post Author
    jaynetics
    Posted April 14, 2025 at 7:00 am

    Reminds me of "Gadsby", a 50.000 word novel without the letter "e":

    https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gadsby_(novel)

  • Post Author
    amelius
    Posted April 14, 2025 at 7:42 am

    Reads like it could have been AI generated.

  • Post Author
    ahazred8ta
    Posted April 14, 2025 at 7:50 am

    For reference, Poul Anderson's 'Uncleftish Beholding' — an essay on atomic theory written in modernized anglo-saxon.

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Uncleftish_Beholding

    Up Goer Five; rocket science explained using only the one thousand most common english words.

    https://www.explainxkcd.com/wiki/index.php/1133:_Up_Goer_Fiv…

    https://www.explainxkcd.com/wiki/index.php/Thing_Explainer

  • Post Author
    TobTobXX
    Posted April 14, 2025 at 7:51 am

    Reminds me also of the "Up Goer Five". An xkcd poster which roughly explains Saturn V with only the top 1000 used words in English[0]. Even better IMO is the collab video with MinutePhysics[1].

    [0]: https://xkcd.com/1133/

    [1]: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2p_8gx-XHJo

  • Post Author
    ActorNightly
    Posted April 14, 2025 at 7:59 am

    The explanation still kinda sucks. I like this one:

    The easiest way to understand the relationship between time and space is repeat the thought experiment with the void, but assume that there is no consciousness there (i.e nothing running that can sense time passing).

    Now imagine the only action you can take is to fire particles (say photons) in a given direction. In a void, that action is meaningless – the particle fires and never comes back. No information exists.

    Now imagine there is a mirror somewhere in space. A particle fires, and then comes back. And maybe interacts with another particle. But still, this is generally meaningless and you cant derive any measurable thing from it, but you have a piece of information – particle comes back.

    Imagine there are 2 mirrors in different directions. What you do is you set up 2 identical devices. Each one fires a particle, and when the particle comes back, it triggers a certain color ball to fall down a common shared tube, and then the particle gets fired again.

    So with 2 mirrors, you get a sequence in the tube that looks something like blue, blue, blue, green, blue, blue, blue, green. Now you can make a measure of distance. You take the "blue" mirror as your unit, and say green mirror is 2 away.

    You have also in fact created a clock. The tube contains information on how many cycles have passed – i.e in order to say that mirror is x away, you need to have counted x blue balls before that respective ball shows up. So you can see how distance and time is intimately intertwined. To measure distance, you have to necessarily have something that measures time.

    Now lets say that the "green" mirror starts moving away from you, at a slow speed (i.e your particles are much faster. You start to see 3 balls in sequence, then 4, then 5, and so on. By comparing the difference in the subsequent position of the green balls, you can measure speed.

    What happens if the speed of the mirror is 99% of the particle speed? The particle takes its sweet time getting there, and sweet time coming back. Even if you fire the particle as the green mirror is close to the particle emitter, its going to result in a measurement of a very large distance.

    This is the relativistic effect where the space behind something moving fast increases.

    This whole experiment demonstrates that what we consider space is precisely defined by measurements, and relativistic effects alter these measurements, which alters our perception of space.

    You can do similar thought experiments to understand why space in front of you seems to shrink, why time dilation becomes a thing, and so on.

  • Post Author
    Tepix
    Posted April 14, 2025 at 8:04 am

    Needs a (1999) tag

Leave a comment

In the Shadows of Innovation”

© 2025 HackTech.info. All Rights Reserved.

Sign Up to Our Newsletter

Be the first to know the latest updates

Whoops, you're not connected to Mailchimp. You need to enter a valid Mailchimp API key.