Skip to content Skip to footer
0 items - $0.00 0

A filmmaker and a crooked lawyer shattered Denmark’s self-image by RapperWhoMadeIt

A filmmaker and a crooked lawyer shattered Denmark’s self-image by RapperWhoMadeIt

A filmmaker and a crooked lawyer shattered Denmark’s self-image by RapperWhoMadeIt

16 Comments

  • Post Author
    robinhoodexe
    Posted March 27, 2025 at 1:16 pm

    The director also made Kim Jong Il’s Comedy Club[1], an absolutely insane documentary on North Korea.

    [1] https://www.imdb.com/title/tt1546653/

  • Post Author
    Oarch
    Posted March 27, 2025 at 1:16 pm

    For all its excellent marketing, of course Denmark has issues much like any other country.

    It's still a great country, just take the marketing with a hint of salt – a self certain smugness / hubris can easily make you blind to real problems.

  • Post Author
    bjornsing
    Posted March 27, 2025 at 1:19 pm

    Great documentary! The story that chocked me most was the social democrat local politician that helped criminals launder money and evade taxes in his spare time… How low can you sink?

  • Post Author
    reptilian
    Posted March 27, 2025 at 1:27 pm

    Same filmmaker exposed US, UK, Apartheid collaboration and involvement in the spread of HIV in Africa, and the assassination of the SecGen of the UN, Dags Hammerskjold

  • Post Author
    arghwhat
    Posted March 27, 2025 at 1:28 pm

    Black Swan was a big deal, but this article massively overstates the average Dane's faith in the system. The welfare state is certainly not reverred as a religion, and the current state of it is always a hot discussion topic with pulls in either direction.

    Unlike what this article suggests, tax fraud is also relatively common (one would have to be rather daft to assume that a country with such absurdly high taxation did not have tax evasion as a key pastime – although probably not as aggressively as in places like the US), and while heavily frowned upon certainly not seen as the highest form of crime as this article suggests. Well, maybe if you ask the tax agency and the political parties pushing for ever more welfare, both of which push heavily for a cashless society where all financial transactions are fully trackable by them, but I think most would place tax evasion quite far down on the list of significant crimes.

    I would instead say that the average Dane is carefree about these issues, not because they are trusting or believe their system is worth religious following, but because the issues experienced there feels quite minor compared to what seems to happen elsewhere in the world. When your concept of a significant natural disaster is a flooded basement, you tend to not worry that much about what happens locally.

  • Post Author
    boomboomsubban
    Posted March 27, 2025 at 1:34 pm

    I wonder if this will impact Denmark's spot at the top of the corruption perceptions index. Last years rankings still has them at first, but it's hard to say when the data was collected. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Corruption_Perceptions_Index

  • Post Author
    frantathefranta
    Posted March 27, 2025 at 1:36 pm

    I'm fully aware that Sweden and Denmark are different countries (I lived in Denmark for 3 years), but this reminded me of the reel of Swedes playing every time I visit IKEA, where they talk about how corruption is absolutely unthinkable in Swedish society.

    And there's also this tidbit from the article:

    > Other Scandinavian nations also reeled upon watching The Black Swan. After the series premiered in Sweden, a criminologist at Lund University warned: “There’s a lot of evidence that it’s probably even worse here.”

  • Post Author
    kratom_sandwich
    Posted March 27, 2025 at 1:54 pm

    Crtl-F "who turns 53 in June" to skip a rather lengthy description of the series (or scroll to the large red "B")

    > Nothing I learned from Smajic solved the central mystery of The Black Swan: why did she choose to capsize her life by participating at all?

    I recall that Herve Falciani only leaked his trove of tax data when a police investigation was closing in on him. Maybe something similar here: a looming indictment?

  • Post Author
    itissid
    Posted March 27, 2025 at 2:55 pm

    Its just people. People are the same everywhere, and are fundamentally unpredictable systems. How large groups behave does depends to a certain extent on context: by compared to others and your socio-economic situation. How they publicly expressed their values are entirely different from their behavior. This is to the dread of incumbent governments and pollsters.

    If you starve a wealthy man for 2 weeks he will be ready to cannibalize. If you create a metric upon which you place a lot of economic-value, soooner or later it will get gamed and corrupted. If you remove checks and balances humans being unpredictable will turn on each other.

    One can choose to ignore this fact, but at the cost of endless grief to oneself and those around.

  • Post Author
    saranshsharma
    Posted March 27, 2025 at 2:57 pm

    [dead]

  • Post Author
    mtgentry
    Posted March 27, 2025 at 3:27 pm

    One nice thing about being on the spectrum is that you can spot morally sketchy situations more clearly—or at least more clearly than most normies. I once walked out of a pitch meeting where we were trying to land a client that completely clashed with a solid, well-paying client we already had. I couldn’t believe no one else saw the huge conflict of interest. No one batted an eyelash.

  • Post Author
    albert_e
    Posted March 27, 2025 at 3:32 pm

    > One out of every two Danes has seen the documentary.

    Why not simpler English — "half of the country has watched it"

    Also pendatic aside — i think "every two danes" is a stretch — i am sure we can find many instances of "two danes" where both has watched it. Or neither. Some are being born as we speak (write).

  • Post Author
    mrweasel
    Posted March 27, 2025 at 3:49 pm

    That seems a bit overblown. I doubt that most wasn't aware that things like this is going on. Perhaps the scale and the number of people involved is a little more than most would have expected. The worst bit, for me and most of the people I debated the documentary with is how people can be so unapologetic about doing irreparable environmental damage. There's currently a another case where a company have blatantly mismanaged handling of polluted soil, in the name of profit. The fact that these people don't give a shit, and the people working of them just hit a wall if they're trying to alert local government is the most choking, not that there's corruption.

    Also this type of corruption isn't seen by Danes in our day to day life, so they don't really register on our corruption perception. I still struggle to view it as corruption and not just straight up criminal activity or deliberate environmental damage.

  • Post Author
    danso
    Posted March 27, 2025 at 4:04 pm

    Besides the description of the scandal for non-Danish audiences, this was also an interesting reflection on the deception inherent in the production of any kind of documentary work, even when it's portrayed as straight CCTV footage.

    > All documentaries are artificial: their footage has been carefully threshed and sieved with an eye to telling a story or pushing an argument. The Black Swan, though, relies on the unblinking, real-time gaze of hidden CCTV cameras, so we lull ourselves into thinking that we’re seeing the full picture, the full truth. No such thing. Instead, we get evasion upon evasion: Smajic’s charade for her clients, Malm cheating the taxman, TV2 withholding their work from the police, Brügger keeping details from his audience. Smajic’s final bluff merely confirms what Brügger seems to have believed throughout his career: everywhere, there are conspiracies and lies that he must expose, even if he has to participate in the dissembling himself.

    > …Smajic believes she’s a victim of journalistic deceit. The Black Swan was meant to be about her life, she said, with the hidden camera footage being used only sparingly to corroborate her stories. She’d been offered no security during the filming, she said. When TV2 screened the first three episodes for her approval, they were really just raw, unedited clips, she maintained, and in any case, she’d been strongly medicated after a surgery and couldn’t assess them with a clear mind. (“Amira watched the edited episodes, they just needed finalising,” TV2’s Nørgaard told me. “During the four hours she spent with the editorial team that day, she appeared unaffected and seemed coherent, as we also documented in the series.”) Smajic hadn’t been running any other office at the time, she said to me, and in any case, “they hadn’t bought the rights to every single moment in my life”.

  • Post Author
    raincom
    Posted March 27, 2025 at 4:14 pm

    In the third world, corruption is very open from the clerk in a local revenue office to the top ministers/secretaries. There is a price for every service.

    In the West, it is hard to see low-level corruption (bribes for services) in offices. However, corruption takes form in the shape of collusion; and this collusion is pretty much legal. Revolving door, consultants, lobbyists, conflicts of interests, setting up NGOs to grab money from the govt, offering sinecure jobs like advisors, directors, etc for friends and family–these are some strategies to do unethical yet legal stuff in the West.

  • Post Author
    B1FF_PSUVM
    Posted March 27, 2025 at 4:20 pm

    I cannae creids there would be something rotten in the state of Denmark

Leave a comment

In the Shadows of Innovation”

© 2025 HackTech.info. All Rights Reserved.

Sign Up to Our Newsletter

Be the first to know the latest updates

Whoops, you're not connected to Mailchimp. You need to enter a valid Mailchimp API key.